Search Results
-
#7461 Up↑ /10 Down↓ [Report] 2015-08-24 23:11 GMT
<fitzgen> Error: failed match: expected property "JSString" not
found in ({婚婚婚婚婚婚婚婚婚:{count:413, bytes:0},
婚婚婚婚婚婚婚婚:{count:1, bytes:0},
婚婚婚婚婚婚婚婚婚婚婚婚婚:{count:25, bytes:0},
婚婚婚婚婚婚婚婚婚婚婚婚婚婚婚:{count:20, bytes:0}}) at
resource://test/Match.jsm:37
<khuey> fitzgen: somebody got seriously married
<fitzgen> married?
<fitzgen> is that what that character is?
<khuey> yes
<fitzgen> happy for them
<fitzgen> not so much for me
<fitzgen> and this bug
* khuey idly wonders what 0x5a5a is in Chinese
<fitzgen> firebot: what is 5a5a5a5a
<firebot> fitzgen: 5a5a5a5a is freed memory
<khuey> fitzgen: https://codepoints.net/U+5A5A
<khuey> that's pretty awesome
<fitzgen> khuey: haha nice!
<khuey> chinese programmers must love that -
#7330 Up↑ /2 Down↓ [Report] 2014-09-11 18:24 GMT
<fitzgen> jimb: sampling w/ probability = .1 adds about 25% overhead of probability = 1.0
<jorendorff> fitzgen: did you try setting the counter initially to a random value, then decrementing?
<jorendorff> fitzgen: and then when it hits zero, log and reset
<fitzgen> jorendorff: that's next, I'm working out the math on paper now
<jimb> jorendorff: You get a different distribution that way.
<jorendorff> jimb, fitzgen: *not necessarily* - I mean, yes, that's true, but perhaps you actually *prefer* a more uniform (not random!) distribution, and you're only perturbing it enough to get rid of resonance
<jimb> jorendorff: I figured out a way to get exactly the same distribution as generating a random number at each event, but which only requires generating random numbers when you actually take a sample.
* jorendorff is so pleased to be a step ahead of jimb on this one
<jorendorff> that never happens
<jimb> jorendorff: You're a step behind.
<fitzgen> ouch
<fitzgen> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_burn_centers_in_the_United_States
<jorendorff> thank you -
#6608 Up↑ /13 Down↓ [Report] 2012-10-11 14:22 GMT
<BenWa> joe_walker: Would a 'restart' firefox GCLI command make sense? It would be useful to me
<joe_walker> i think it would
<joe_walker> hang on
<paul> :)
<joe_walker> ok
<joe_walker> done
<BenWa> That was fast :)
<past> :-D
<joe_walker> BenWa: try it now -
#6402 Up↑ /6 Down↓ [Report] 2012-04-25 21:45 GMT
<past> joe_walker: I think you forgot to update the patches you pushed with a [fixed-in-fx-team] whiteboard tag
<robcee> ATROCITY!
<victorporof> some men just want to watch the whole world burn
<robcee> ooh, good quote
<robcee> new dark knight movie soon >_< -
#6283 Up↑ /5 Down↓ [Report] 2012-02-22 19:25 GMT
<kumar> sxsw state of browser dev tools has a google moderator page, fyi: http://www.google.com/moderator/#15/e=1eb2cb&t=1eb2cb.40&f=1eb2cb.63e95f (not sure if the panel will be live though)
<robcee> don't care!
<robcee> can't attend. shipping software. -
#5962 Up↑ /4 Down↓ [Report] 2011-08-29 16:23 GMT
<jorendorff> fitzgen: I don't understand, it works for me
<jorendorff> I am utterly baffled
<fitzgen> hmmm
<jorendorff> this probably got broken when the reviewers had me rename everything three times
<jorendorff> and for some reason it's still working for me
<fitzgen> This was in the scratchpad, do you think it is some kind of wierd interaction there>?
<fitzgen> or maybe obj related?
<jorendorff> fitzgen: no, it's definitely something wrong with the patch
<jorendorff> fitzgen: *and* a counter-wrongness in my environment
<jorendorff> two wrongs clearly make a right... a right that is all the more wrong for its rightness
<fitzgen> righteous
Kindly hosted by jX and in no way affiliated with the Mozilla Foundation.