Search Results
-
#7626 Up↑ /5 Down↓ [Report] 2019-05-22 22:11 GMT
<jimb> mrgiggles: pun
<mrgiggles> jimb: I should have been sad when my flashlight batteries died, but I was delighted.
<jimb> 8/10, I snickered
<jorendorff> yeah that's ... better than expected
<Wes> my secret to confess is that I steal jokes from mrgiggles
<Waldo> be proud
<sfink> I do too. for my kids It moves my dad joke success zone from "stony silence" all the way past "eye roll" into the promised land of "reluctant chuckle" -
#7349 Up↑ /2 Down↓ [Report] 2014-11-04 00:31 GMT
<jimb> mrgiggles: pun
<mrgiggles> jimb: When chemists die, we barium.
<zombie> ouch
<jimb> mrgiggles: pun
<mrgiggles> jimb: When chemists die, we barium.
<jimb> mrgiggles: pun
<mrgiggles> jimb: Two robbers with clubs went golfing, but they didn't play the fairway.
<sfink> hey!
<efaust> sfink: no timeout on joke retelling?
<jimb> mrgiggles: pun
<mrgiggles> jimb: A small boy swallowed some coins and was taken to a hospital. When his grandmother telephoned to ask how he was, a nurse said 'No change yet'.
<sfink> efaust: no, and apparently you think a lot like I do because I'm intending to implement it -
#7306 Up↑ /3 Down↓ [Report] 2014-07-23 00:23 GMT
* Waldo doesn't know how many non-selfhosted array methods are around these days
<jorendorff> some
<jorendorff> ok, thanks
<Waldo> jorendorff++
<jorendorff> for what?
<Waldo> jorendorff: some
<Waldo> tho I bet it's self-hosted
<jorendorff> pfft
<Waldo> \o/ -
#7281 Up↑ /7 Down↓ [Report] 2014-06-07 01:45 GMT
<fitzgen> should or shouldn't this throw an error? https://gist.github.com/fitzgen/1842c22ffd0d3db33418
<jorendorff> fitzgen: It should throw an error.
<jorendorff> fitzgen: `d instanceof Date` only checks the prototype chain. It does not actually check whether d is an instance of the Date class.
<jorendorff> Here, d is just a plain Object with an unusual prototype.
<jorendorff> fitzgen: Subclassing is coming soon. This sort of thing will be possible without assigning to __proto__. But we're not quite there yet.
<Waldo> fitzgen: Date.prototype.valueOf.call(d) not throwing is enough to verify an actual Date object, for now
<shu> is JS going to get bless?
<Waldo> don't we have plenty of pearls of wisdom of our own to add already?
<jorendorff> you are both fired
<Waldo> \o/ -
#7138 Up↑ /6 Down↓ [Report] 2013-11-05 20:11 GMT
<Waldo> sfink: rack-mounted devs sounds painful, and not good for usable lifetime
<sfink> data centers already have to handle cooling. Feeding shouldn't be that hard to add.
<Waldo> sfink: hm, maybe; should we consider rack-mounted devs a Q4 stretch goal?
* sfink groans
<Waldo> \o/
Kindly hosted by jX and in no way affiliated with the Mozilla Foundation.