Search Results
-
#6612 Up↑ /5 Down↓ [Report] 2012-10-15 22:09 GMT
<burg> this is a pretty nice summary of webkit development https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16768
<burg> "r-. your rendering doesn't match AppKit!"
<burg> "What does appkit do?" > "IDK"
<burg> "can I look at Appkit source?" > "no"
<burg> "can I fix for some ports without solving all ports' problems?" > "no"
<burg> "can you r? my patch that fixes all ports?" > "your patch is too big. go away"
<jdm> that sounds depressing
<mccr8> "This bug is out of control"
<mccr8> oh man, and the last real activity in the bug was 3 years ago. I guess the person just gave up, which is understandable... -
#5416 Up↑ /8 Down↓ [Report] 2010-09-08 20:31 GMT
<sdwilsh> NeilAway: nobody uses Gecko. Webkit is the new hotness
<dwitte_> sdwilsh: can we have a q1 goal to switch to webkit?
<dwitte_> we should do it for an early alpha
<sdwilsh> oh, I bet shaver would love that
<sdwilsh> we could use v8 or nitro too
<sdwilsh> hey, then we'd be like flock!
<dwitte_> nah we'll just ship without a js engine
<dwitte_> makes webpages faster
<Mossop> gmail will load lightning fast
<dwitte_> we'd get a time of zero on sunspider and v8
<dwitte_> EAT THAT GOOGLE
<Mossop> Actually, I suspect they would never complete
<sdwilsh> r=sdwilsh
<dwitte_> do I hear an a=sayrer?
* dwitte_ gets back to work -
#4980 Up↑ /11 Down↓ [Report] 2010-02-11 00:19 GMT
<sdwilsh> bent: does that help us in any benchmarks?
<bent> worker benchmarks?
<bent> surely you jest
<sdwilsh> maybe I should make one
<sdwilsh> that'd give you a bunch of work to do, wouldn't it? :P
<bent> no way, i'd have a baseline ;)
<bent> hard to regress that with no changes
<sdwilsh> yeah, but if I write it so webkit is faster
<bent> then i supply you with concrete shoes and we go for a walk on the golden gate bridge ;) -
#4810 Up↑ /11 Down↓ [Report] 2009-11-03 22:09 GMT
<jamesr> dglazkov: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31084 - what do we do!
<dglazkov> jamesr: go boom?
<jamesr> correct! but what should we do?
<dglazkov> jamesr: not go boom? -
#4753 Up↑ /15 Down↓ [Report] 2009-10-03 23:43 GMT
<preed> I love how people always say "X should switch to webkit"
<preed> as if it were some compile-time flag
<@ali> you should switch to female
<preed> yes
<preed> it's faster.
<preed> and less bloated.
<@ali> hm.
<@ali> no, not really.
<preed> haha -
#3855 Up↑ /15 Down↓ [Report] 2008-07-08 05:50 GMT
<Ventron> oh jesus: http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/35050
<Ventron> "We decided to special-case the filename of the script and tweak the appVersion for files with that name. "
<Ventron> one must wonder how many hardcoded hacks that look for such volatile conditions are in the webkit codebase
<shaver> wow, that is pretty wild
<Ventron> i think i'll rename some js files on my sites to "dqm_script.js" for fun
<shaver> heh
<sayrer> so I guess we know what to call our next compliance test file
<Ventron> sayrer: make sure you stick some AcidAhemFont tests in there -
#2139 Up↑ /10 Down↓ [Report] 2007-03-15 05:14 GMT
<proton> look, it must be dhyatt's fault. i read on the interwebs that he wrote the entire browser himself
<dhyatt> proton: you must be thinking of another browser
<proton> dhyatt: oh, so it was camino you wrote by yourself then?
<dhyatt> yup all 5 million lines of mozilla code
<dhyatt> all by myself
<dhyatt> nobody else
• Hwin giggles.
<cying> did i hear that dhyatt wrote all 5 million lines of mozilla?
<proton> yes
<cying> impressive
<dkirker> wow
<cying> we should spread this rumor further
<proton> it's not a rumour, it's the truth!
<cying> step 1. mkdir mozilla
<cying> step 2. (flurry of typing)
<cying> step 3. make && make install
<Catfish_Man> cying: that reminds me of the R. Feynman method of solving problems
<Catfish_Man> 1) get sheet of paper
<Catfish_Man> 2) think very hard
<Catfish_Man> 3) write down answer
Kindly hosted by jX and in no way affiliated with the Mozilla Foundation.